1. Pride
Why was the first offering to God, and
that God accepted, a living creature, a sheep ? (I don't speak of the gifts
that pagan people usually gave to self-made deities.)
This is the story of Abel and Cain in
Genesis, chapter 4.
v3: "Cain brought of the fruit of
the ground an offering unto the LORD."
v4: "And Abel, he also brought of
the firstlings of his flock and of the fat thereof. "
v5: "And the LORD had respect unto
Abel and to his offering; but unto Cain and to his offering He had not
respect."
Cain had two reasons to be sure his
offering would be honored by God; he was the firstborn and he valued his
offering as of greatest value than that of his brother because he had to work
harder than Abel to produce it since it is more difficult to be a plowman than
a shepherd. Cain was twice proud in advance of his domination over his smaller
brother. And the result was he was not agreed by God. Why was that ??
There are a few causes to God's decision,
all dependent from one another. The first is that man could not be proud of the
result of working as a plowman because God had cursed the earth as is said in
Genesis 3/17: " ... cursed is the ground for thy sake; in toil shalt thou eat
of it all the days of thy life." Man cannot put his pride into working the
ground for a living because, as a result from the curse, he could not anymore only eat fruits but had
to plant and harvest as said in v18-19 : "Thorns also and thistles shall it
bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field. In the sweat of
thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it
wast thou taken; for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return."
Because of the fall, man could not use
God's creation to sustain himself as all the animals but he had to work for it.
The earth was cursed but only in relation to man's life. Then, man could not
put his pride in the result of his working the land because this work had
resulted of the curse.
Add that to the error in believing that
being the firstborn would give him pre-eminence over his younger brother
without proving that he was worth of it, as in the case of Essav and Yaakov for
instance, and one may understand that Cain was full of unjustified pride which
did result in God rejecting his offer.
On the contrary, Abel was neither proud
of himself nor of what he was offering because cattle grow alone without substantial
work and it is the direct result of the creation goodness. Then, you might ask
how God did prefer in the end the sacrifice of a living creature, a sheep to
the 'fruits of the ground' ? The simple answer is because when man kills an
animal to eat it, or to offer it to God, he asserts that, first he does not
value life in and for itself but as a mean to prove that God, as the Creator,
can do what He wants with what He has created and that man is first and
foremost His instrument and not his own master, his own goal but God's creation
as everything else, and then, that God agrees that man can use His creation,
and values the strength man has to deploy in killing the animal, in order to
please Him and to make a living with something that had not been cursed but
blessed as good.
The moral aspect in conclusion of this
explanation is that man cannot take pride in what he does to success in his
life when using what God has created, both that is cursed or not. Pride is the
primary obstacle of being agreed by God as His children and being loved by Him.
Man has not to be proud of what he creates because at the beginning, he uses
tools and laws that were all created by God. Pride in being who one is has no
place in the life of an honorable man; pride is outlawed from the start no
matter what comes afterward.
2. Order out of Chaos
The world we live in is not void of laws,
laws that have reached the emergence of life and consciousness, laws that are
at the origin of stars, light, heat, pure water, fresh air, beautiful flowers,
rocks, trees and animals. The universe has an aim, which we would be fools to
pretend to know but as much fools as not to appreciate for what it is, good.
Still in Genesis, God said numerously that what He had done was good and any
normally constituted person cannot but approve that qualification of what is.
There is an intimate order in the world and this order has a purpose, at least
in giving birth to who we are, conscious beings able to appreciate the beauty
and the perfection of life. There is an immanent order from which we
beneficiate daily and that we can use to grow a tremendous society of happy
beings, at least in theory, but no one can deny the ability exists.
Well, not exactly no one because there
are people who walk in the steps of the 'Angel of death' and deny this evidence
because they do not want to consider themselves as indebted to anyone else than
themselves. There are people who consider themselves as their own masters, as
the supreme rulers of anything that they can exert their power upon, that put
their pride before any gratitude, that are traitors to the creation and the
Creator.
Those evil stringed entities thus deny
any underlying order and consider the universe as born from chaos in which they
would set their own rules to be the sole masters of every existence, every
rock, plant and being. They thus pretend that, since there is no inherent order,
they are destined to create their own order, and not only but, in that they see
traces of order, they pretend they are entitled to destroy. They are the 'Lion
Pride' as would have said Joseph Ehrlich, they are the destroyers, they are the
children of Evil, they are the conquerors, the Nazis, the creators of all the
systems that they devise to rule over humanity, all the "isms" from
capitalism to communism through Christianism and Zionism, Buddhism, Islamism, Manichaeism,
all of them fit their desire, every one of them is useful to pretend that they
are the creators of humanity, of life. All of psychology, economy, sociology,
history, psychiatry, biology ... are destined to fit their purpose of creating
a world of their own, a world that does not recognize its natural godly origin
and destiny.
3. How death is good to ‘them’
Well, let’s say in short why all the “isms”
are evil. Although every “ism” has some truth in it, it can be used by the NWO because
every “ism” is the result of man’s thought, every “ism” is the child of man’s
pride to invent who he is by himself. Every “ism” is idolatry albeit hidden by its
intent to be universal and ‘not for profit’. Every “ism” is excluding many
other “isms” and the net rewards of these oppositions are wars and deaths, and
every possible suffering in the middle. All those “isms” are the greatest
culprits of the fall of humanity, well, not the fall since there has never been
such a rise to speak of a fall !! The advocates of these “isms” justify all the
means to achieve their aims including death and suffering which are in their
satanic views necessary to fulfill their will. In such a spirit, collateral
damage is more useful to them than the main destruction they inflict in the
course of the New World Order that they want before all. Mengele’s suffering
was more central to Hitler’s war than conquering Poland. Cancer causing
products are more important than sending troops to die in Vietnam. Forbidding a
vegetable garden is more vital to them than taking down the twin towers and the
3000 dead that went by it. They need to destroy the roots humanity has with
itself before effectively killing people.
NB: I sincerely regret that I don't write a better english !!
No comments:
Post a Comment