Most of the public spaces are fitted with perfume dispensers. What a convenient way to spray, well, anything that may be useful to the Big Boot ...
In mid-May 2020, shortly after she'd left Hong Kong, the journal Nature published a paper Yan had co-written, detailing the pathogenesis and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in golden hamsters.
This experiment showed SARS-CoV-2 primarily spreads
via aerosol.
The Wuhan Laboratory Origin of SARS-CoV-2
and the Validity
of the Yan Reports Are Further Proved by the Failure of Two Uninvited
"Peer Reviews" Opening Statement
March 2021
DOI:10.5281/zenodo.4650821
Project: COVID-19
Authors:
Limeng Yan
The University of Hong Kong
Shu Kang
Shanchang Hu
Abstract and Figures
Abstract The origin of SARS-CoV-2 is a question that has
attracted attention from all over the world. It has been portrayed by some as a
great mystery, although the laboratory nature of this virus is evident to
people with trained eyes. The fundamental reason for this current situation is
a large-scale, multi-domain, deliberate scientific misinformation. In an effort
to defeat this scientific misinformation and expose the true nature of
SARS-CoV-2, we have published two scientific reports. Our first report showed,
using substantial evidence and logical analyses, why SARS-CoV-2 must be a
laboratory product and how it could be created conveniently by following
well-known concepts and established techniques. Our second report exposed a
large-scale, organized scientific fraud, through which the nature of SARS-CoV-2
as an Unrestricted Bioweapon was revealed. Our efforts were immediately met by
great resistance. Within ten days of the publication of our first report, two
self-claimed “peer reviews” came out to specifically criticize our report. The
first review was published by four scientists from the Johns Hopkins Center for
Health Security led by Dr. Gigi Gronvall. The second review was published on
the MIT Press and produced by a group of four scientists led by Dr. Robert
Gallo. Although we welcome critical reviews of our reports, such reviews have
to be honest, logical, evidence-based, and produced by qualified scientists.
These two reviews, however, did not meet any of the criteria. Unfortunately,
these poor reviews were nonetheless used by the media to defame our reports,
label laboratory origin theories as “conspiracy theories”, and further suppress
the truth of SARS-CoV-2 origin. Building on these media reports, the Chinese
Communist Party (CCP) regime then greatly amplified its own voice and promoted
the falsified theory that SARS-CoV-2 must have come from nature. In a continued
effort to fight and defeat scientific misinformation, here we provide our
point-to-point responses to these reviews. Part I of the document is our
responses to the MIT Press review, and Part II is our responses to the review
published by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. We also included an
opening statement at the beginning, where we summarized the main events of the
Unrestricted Scientific Misinformation, including various cover-ups executed by
individuals having close ties with the CCP regime, as well as Dr. Yan’s
sustained efforts in exposing the truth of COVID-19. We sincerely hope that
this document may help the world recognize the ongoing misinformation campaign
and come to the realization that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is an Unrestricted
Bioweapon developed by the CCP regime. We believe that this realization is
crucial in defeating the COVID-19 pandemic and in protecting the global
community from future bioweapon attacks. Publication Note (July 17th, 2021):
The three Yan reports used scientific evidence and analyses to prove that
SARS-CoV-2 is an Unrestricted Bioweaponcreated by military scientists of the
Chinese Communist Party (CCP) regime. These reports have played a pivotal role
in revealing the true identity of the ongoing Unrestricted Biowarfare. For this
reason, the CCP and its allies have been constantly launching attacks at the
Yan Reports. Very recently, the Rule of Law Foundation (ROLF) and Rule of Law
Society (ROLS), which we have listed as our honorary affiliation in our
reports, requested Zenodo to have the original uploads of our reports closed.
This was done by the ROLF & ROLS without informing us authors or seeking
our agreement. This is unacceptable because the work was done by us authors
independently with no financial assistance provided by the ROLF & ROLS or
any other organization. Their action here has no scientific basis and is
against the rules of scientific publications. To restore the availability of
our reports to the world, we have therefore re-uploaded the three Yan reports.
Our affiliation has been changed to Yan Research – An Independent Research
Team. The current report was originally published on March 31st, 2021. As of
July 16th, 2021, the original Zenodo upload of it has been viewed 246,571 times
and downloaded 43,152 times. Upon mutual agreement, Dr. Jie Guan opted out of
this publication and his contributions have instead been specified in the
acknowledgements. Wording on the number of authors has been changed
accordingly. Minor typos have been corrected.
Walmart recalls aromatherapy spray due to presence of rare and
deadly bacteria
No comments:
Post a Comment