Original text of the article posted at
henrimakow.com
One cannot
understand the current geopolitical events without asserting the view
I try to
succinctly present in the following text.
Everyone is
speaking of the New World Order. Two questions arise about it:
1. Before
the NWO, what kind of a power was in charge of the World Order, if any?
2. Is the
NWO united ?
The NWO did
appear around the nineteen century and it took the shape of different alliances
before becoming the one we know. If the French revolution can be considered as
the first lever to undermine the pre-existent traditional powers, it is not
before the beginning of the 20th century that it morphed into the
Anglo-American domination of the world that has been since then the mightiest
sheriff of our planet.
Its roots
as everyone knows lies in the alliance of the money powers of the German Jews
and the military naval domination of the seas by England - that later was
translated to the USA. Before that, there was no vacuum in the domination of
the people of Europe and the main agent were the descendants of the Franks
together with the Catholic Church that lasted one thousand years. All the European kings were family connected
and, despite their wars, it was them that ruled the ancient world.
One man
tried to erase this force by hijacking the French revolution and fighting both
England and the remaining kings of Europe in an attempt to set Europe free from
their world views, Napoleon Bonaparte. But he failed because, on this occasion,
England financed the armies of the ancient kings to get rid of him.
But this
one time alliance between England and the European kings could not last since
the goals of the money lenders was to undermine all the European countries in
order to reign alone. Then, the European nobility, embroiled in their divisions
continued to fight one another, without noticing how much they were helping the
British strategy in doing so. The First World War was the first involvement of
America on the world stage as a main power that culminated with the Second
World War and became on this occasion the main world power that has stayed at
the wheel until today.
The
Anglo-Saxons have led the world from the First World War and they are what we
call the NWO. But, the kings of old together with the Catholic Church never
accepted their demise and remained united underground since then. They are what
I would call the Old World Order.
So, to summarize, the NWO now comprises England
and the nations of the former British Commonwealth, the Jewish bankers and
Israel, the USA and the Sunni monarchies led by Saudi Arabia, Jordan and a few
allies like Poland, Japan, and South Korea. The OWO, Old World Order, includes
for its part most of European countries, Russia and its allies like China, Iran
and the Shiites, Turkey, the Catholic and Orthodox churches although the
Catholic authorities are divided much like Italy on the subject.
The NWO
despite their success has made several mistakes, some planned but others not.
Nazism was their creation meant to defeat the last European king as well as
putting Europe on its knees after the Anglo-American victory. That succeeded.
But, the overtaking of Russia by communism failed to remain directed by them
and they had to plan their first culture change to get rid of it. What they did
not manage to achieve was keeping the Russian federation under their boot. Russia
became independent and turned back to its old European Christian roots while it
moved to regain the second military power it had when it was the USSR.
One can also differentiate them on their principles that are, for the NWO the desire of a global hegemony based on commercial domination and ideas/cultural hegemony (Orwell like) and for the OWO industrial mastery laced with state preponderance.
Meanwhile
too, the European countries got more and more angry to remain dependent of the
Anglo-Saxon NWO and jumped on the occasion of the renewal of Russia on its old
basis to begin secession from the NWO. That is precisely what we are witnessing
today. Brexit was an effort from the Anglo-Saxons to regain their independence
from the European countries that, on the example of Russia, have a desire to
manage themselves the European power. Trump’s election was another card from
the Anglo-Saxons to try a less aggressive policy with the Old World Order
rising from its ashes, but to no avail.
The NWO is
now moving to fortify its assets and regroup as much as it can as we can see in
the incredible new talks between Saudi Arabia and Israel. The NWO monopoly is
definitely broken and we can expect growing conflicts between the two factions,
especially this year that is the hundred year’s anniversary of the Balfour Declaration. We should not expect Britain and America to
let go their slightest assets and, in this perspective, the war in Syria might
become incredibly awful until it could lead to a Third World War mostly because
the NWO has no time waiting that Russia’s military become more powerful day
after day.
References:
"Intriguingly,
Mr Macron's comments came just hours after Wolfgang Schäuble, the powerful
German finance minister, sent out an identical message – saying the UK would
find “open doors” in Brussels if it decided not to leave the EU."
"There is
currently no viable alternative to Bashar Assad to prevent Syria from turning
into a failed state, the new French president has said, departing from his
predecessor’s position that the Syrian leader must be toppled to stabilize the
war-torn country."
As a final thought,
- no one seems to understand that the slogan of Obama's election could have been identically the same for Trump: "Change we believe in".
- just as no one seems to understand what I tried to explain above, yeah, really no one, although it looks quite simple and obvious !!
Now, let me
answer to that poor guy named Andrew, the first comment on Makow's site:
First
Comment by Andrew
Avi
Gleitzer's summary of history is intriguing, because he asks the right
questions. I'm not convinced there ever was an Old World Order. Today, world
domination is based upon Anglo-American supremacy of three industries (energy,
munitions and drugs) and its mastery of psychological warfare.
1000 years
of domination from Kings and Clergy is not a World Order … Gosh, if not, what is !!
Wrong
again, the two levers of Anglo-Saxon’s domination are, one, money power and
commercial control and two, army technology. Rest is blablabla.
F
William Engdahl asks the same questions in his new book, The Lost Hegemon. He
concludes Anglo-American supremacy is fading fast to be replaced soon by a
multipolar world where China, Russia, Iran, Pakistan, South Africa and Brazil
will increasingly counter-balance Anglo-American hegemony.
My boy,
speak in your name before bringing third party, especially of the kind of
Engdahl, a self-applauded pundit who’d better plant carrots.
WW III
is not an option, because nuclear deterrence will prevail and bring leaders of
the world to their senses. Lost hegemony temper tantrums are just not an
option.
Uh ! bring
to their senses people who kill their own population like in 9/11, who destroy
entire civilian nations like Indians or Yemen or Vietnam, short memories and
ignorance if you bring in the picture Hiroshima, Nagasaki and the Nazis’ 2nd
WW …
“Lost
hegemony temper tantrum”
Tell that to my dog but not to a Rockfeller, a
Rotschild, a Bush, a Hillary …
Conclusion:
Total idiocy, thanks. Next ?
