I would have titled that page : " Under the boot of the 3rd Reich "
Well, all countries of the world are oppressive, one can now, thanks to the Corona, judge by the facts, but those who lead the game and that have come to a global power over every government of the world are German-American-Saxon white men of the north (Jews and not Jews, in fact, no Jews at all because so-called Ashkenazim Jews have usurped the qualification of jewishness).
What we see today is the perfect continuation of the worst collective 'experiences' that have taken place since a mere hundred years. Nazi Germany, Communist Russia and China, Islamic takeover, wars, crimes, all of these have their origin in the Tavistock Institute, in white men hatred of others thanks to their belief of superiority of races ... Hey Bob !!!
(interesting link : https://consentfactory.org/)
Aldous Huxley, an English writer and
philosopher, wrote nearly 50 books, the most famous being “Brave New World,” a
dystopian science-fiction novel published in 1932. The world in the novel is a futuristic
one based on science and technology. Emotions and the sense of individuality
are eliminated,starting in childhood, via the use of conditioning.1
It’s a work of fiction, but concepts on which
it is based, including the power to condition humans to accept an abnormal
state of life, are not. In the video above, you can hear a 1962 interview with
Huxley, in which he speaks about the use of persuasion and conditioning to gain
ultimate power and control over society.
“If you are
going to control a population for any length of time you must have some measure
of consent,” he said. His words ring eerily true in 2021.
Conditioning Humans to Love Servitude
Frederick Douglas once said, “When a slave
becomes a happy slave, he has effectively relinquished all that makes him
human.” How does a human get to the point of loving their servitude, or
consenting to live in, and even enjoy, a state of affairs that they should not?
Often, it’s through techniques of terrorism.
While the word implies violence, some of the most profound and dangerous
techniques combine methods of terror with methods of acceptance, Huxley said.
By bringing in elements of persuasion, it’s possible for a controlling
oligarchy to get people to love their servitude.
In 1957, William Sargant published “Battle for
the Mind,” which delves into the techniques used by evangelists, psychiatrists
and politicians to change beliefs and behavior. Religious leaders produce
conversions, Huxley said, by heightening psychological stress, talking about
hell, then releasing this stress by offering a promise of heaven. Prisoners of
war can be similarly brainwashed and pressured into making admissions of guilt.
Pavlov’s dogs study is one of the most
well-known displays of the power of conditioning. The dogs salivated not only
in response to food but in response to any object or event that they learned to
associated with food.
The findings also apply to humans, who can be
conditioned to associate abstract images with food, as shown by researchers
with the Wellcome department of neuroimaging science at University College
London.
When shown pictures of the food-associated
images, their reaction times increased and areas of their brain involved in
motivation and emotional processes were activated.
After Pavlov’s demonstration of classical
conditioning, the profound observations “sunk into the creature,” Huxley said,
and Pavlovian methods were recognized as tools that could be applied with
extraordinary efficiency, creating large armies of totally devoted people.
Ultimate Power Involves Voluntary Acceptance
Non-terroristic methods are also essential in
gaining ultimate control, as some measure of voluntary acceptance is necessary.
Suggestion and hypnosis are two examples. According to Huxley, about 20% of
people are easily hypnotized, while 20% are very difficult, if not impossible,
to hypnotize. The remaining 60%, the majority, can be gradually hypnotized if
you work hard enough at it.6
Similar figures apply to the power of placebo,
or suggestion, Huxley said, referring to a study on the administration of
morphine or a placebo following surgery. The subjects were experiencing similar
levels of pain and were able to receive injections for pain relief whenever
requested. Half the injections were morphine and half were distilled water, the
placebo.
While 20% of the subjects got just as much pain
relief from the placebo as from the morphine, 20% got no relief from the
placebo and 60% got some or occasional relief from the placebo. Such studies
are important, because it isn’t hard to figure out which segment of the
population is extremely vulnerable to suggestion and which is in the
intermediate space.
As Huxley pointed out, such differences allow
for organized society to exist, because if everyone were unsuggestable, there
would be no order to society. At the other end of the spectrum, if everyone
were highly suggestable, dictatorship would be inevitable. Having the majority
of people in the “moderately suggestable” category is a happy medium, allowing
for the formation and preservation of organized society.
At the same time, the fact that there are 20%
of people who are extremely vulnerable to suggestion is of enormous political
importance. Whoever gets ahold of the 20% can easily overthrow any government
or country, Huxley said, using the example of Hitler to show what can be done
using the power of suggestion.
Hitler understood human weaknesses and
exploited them. For instance, knowing that conditioning is easier when people
are tired, Hitler held all of his big speeches at night solely so that people
would be tired and therefore less capable of resisting persuasion.
What Are the Limits of Human Obedience ?
In 1962, in a now infamous experiment, Yale
University psychologist Stanley Milgram tested the limits of human obedience to
authority. The study administrator instructed the study subjects — the
“teachers” — to give electric shocks to a student.
The “student” was actually an actor, but the
study subjects were unaware of this, and complied with the demands to shock him
whenever he gave an incorrect response to a question. Even as the student
moaned, begged for the shocks to stop and ultimately stopped responding, the
subjects obeyed the authority figure in the room and issued painful electric
shocks.
The subjects were clearly uncomfortable with
the task at times, but still continued, showing that people may carry out
heinous acts when ordered to do so by authorities because they feel less
responsible for the behavior in this capacity.
The Milgram experiment was later criticized for
being unethical and, in the U.S., studies that cause subjects serious distress
were later banned. However, similar studies in Europe confirmed the results,
suggesting that people will willingly and blindly obey authoritarian orders,
especially if they feel disconnected from their actions.
With societal norms rapidly changing, and an
increasingly authoritative environment emerging, will humans stop thinking for
themselves and proceed fully into a world where privacy no longer exists and
citizens turn in their neighbors if they buck the status quo?
You’ll Own Nothing and Love It
Huxley’s science-fiction world in which people
learn to love their servitude sounds terrifying to most free thinking humans.
But it’s something that’s being openly discussed. Top political figures and Big
Tech leaders are using the common refrain that the COVID-19 pandemic has
provided an opportunity to “reset” and “build back better.”
“Build back
better” is a tagline of sorts for The Great Reset, and though this is being
played off as a new initiative, it’s simply a rebranding of terms for
technocracy and the old “New World Order.”
An elite oligarchy is behind this technocratic
plan to govern society through technology, programmed by scientists and
technicians and automated through the use of artificial intelligence, rather
than through democratically elected politicians and government leaders.
The current pandemic is being used as a
justification for the movement, but the agenda has nothing to do with health and
everything to do with a long-term plan to monitor and control the world through
technical surveillance. Part of the “new normal” dictum is that you will own
nothing and be happy. This excerpt was written by Ida Auken, agenda contributor
to the World Economic Forum (WEF):
“Welcome to
the year 2030. Welcome to my city — or should I say, "our city." I
don't own anything. I don't own a car. I don't own a house. I don't own any
appliances or any clothes.
It might seem odd to you, but it makes perfect
sense for us in this city. Everything you considered a product, has now become
a service … Once in a while I get annoyed about the fact that I have no real
privacy. Nowhere I can go and not be registered. I know that, somewhere,
everything I do, think and dream of is recorded. I just hope that nobody will
use it against me. All in all, it is a good life.”
The unstated implication is that the world’s
resources will be owned and controlled by the technocratic elite, and you’ll
have to pay for the temporary use of absolutely everything.
Nothing will actually belong to you. All items
and resources are to be used by the collective, while actual ownership is
restricted to an upper stratum of social class. Through the power of
conditioning, humans could come to not only accept this new form of society,
but love it.
The Conditioning Has Already Begun
The very purpose of “building back better” is
to do away with what was once “normal” and replace it with something different.
According to WEF, this entails “reinventing capitalism”:
“A true
recovery from COVID-19 will not be about putting things back together the way
they were: we need to ‘build back better’, to 'reset', if we are to address the
deep systemic vulnerabilities the pandemic has exposed.
… If we
don’t seize this opportunity to build back better — to reset and reinvent
rather than 'return to normal' — systemic risks and vulnerabilities will
continue to accumulate, making future shocks both more likely and more
dangerous.
Despite the tragedy, we must leverage the COVID-19
pandemic, and make sure that it becomes the catalyst for a profoundly positive
transformation of the global economy, taking us closer to a world in which
everyone can live well, within planetary boundaries.”
If you don’t think this is possible, consider
that the conditioning has already begun. Using fear as a driving force, society
not only adapted to but embraced lockdowns, universal masking and mass
vaccination with an experimental injection, all without solid data to back up
the effectiveness and necessity of these draconian measures.
The vaccines were supposed to stop the spread
of COVID-19, but fully vaccinated people can still transmit the virus, and
censorship of anyone who speaks out about the numerous inconsistencies has
become rampant. With the roll out of vaccine passports, unvaccinated people are
being increasingly excluded from society, facing a loss of privileges and
being morally shamed and labeled selfish.
In New York City, as of August 16, 2021, proof
of vaccination will be required to enter restaurants, gyms and theaters. As
civil liberties, privacy and freedom are being slowly chipped away, all for a
virus with a documented high survival rate, many are supportive of even more
questionable restrictions. There are also those, however, who are increasingly
rebelling against lockdowns and vaccine passports.
In July 2021, after France’s parliament
approved a law that requires a vaccine passport to enter restaurants, trains,
planes and certain other public venues, more than 160,000 people, including
11,000 in Paris, protested against the “health pass,” even as police released
tear gas and water cannons against some of the protestors.
Therein may lie one key to stopping the
conditioning being foisted upon the public, namely speaking out against what
you don’t believe is right. The alternative is much darker, and you can get a
glimpse into such an authoritarian future from George Orwell, who said:
In our
world there will be no emotions except fear, rage, triumph and self-abasement.
The sex instinct will be eradicated. We shall abolish the orgasm. There will be
no loyalty except loyalty to the party, but always there will be the
intoxication of power. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of
victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who’s helpless.”
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face, forever.
The morality to be drawn from this dangerous nightmare situation is a simple one.
Don’t let it happen. It depends on you.”
