related
Military Training forYoung Children at Ukraine’s “Neo-Nazi Summer Camp”. Recruitment of Ukraine’s“Child Soldiers” Financed by US “Nonlethal” Military Aid?
Gypsies teenagers and families with women and children tied to lamp posts with duct tape,
their faces sprayed with antiseptic dye that can cause chemical burns to the eyes.
No gas chambers ??
Giordano Bruno and Jeanne d'Arc were too tied to poles before being burned ...
Make Nazism Great
Again ?
SATURDAY, MAR 26, 2022
Authored by Pepe
Escobar,
The supreme target is
regime change in Russia, Ukraine is just a pawn in the game – or worse, mere
cannon fodder...
All eyes are on
Mariupol. As of Wednesday night, over 70% of residential areas were under
control of Donetsk and Russian forces, while Russian Marines, Donetsk’s 107th
batallion and Chechen Spetsnaz, led by the charismatic Adam Delimkhanov, had
entered the Azov-Stal plant – the HQ of the neo-Nazi Azov batallion.
Azov was sent a last
ultimatum: surrender until midnight – or else, as in a take no prisoners
highway to hell.
That implies a major
game-changer in the Ukrainian battlefield; Mariupol is finally about to be
thoroughly denazified – as the Azov contingent long entrenched in the city and
using civilians as human shields were their most hardened fighting force.
Meanwhile, echoes from
the Empire of Lies all but gave the whole game away. There’s no intention
whatsoever in Washington to facilitate a peace plan in Ukraine – and that
explains Comedian Zelensky’s non-stop stalling tactics. The supreme target is
regime change in Russia, and for that Totalen Krieg against Russia and all
things Russian is warranted. Ukraine is just a pawn in the game – or worse,
mere cannon fodder.
This also means that
the 14,000 deaths in Donbass for the past 8 years should be directly attributed
to the Exceptionalists. As for Ukrainian neo-Nazis of all stripes, they are as
expendable as “moderate rebels” in Syria, be they al-Qaeda or Daesh-linked.
Those that may eventually survive can always join the budding CIA-sponsored
Neo-Nazi Inc. – the tawdry remix of the 1980s Jihad Inc. in Afghanistan. They
will be properly “Kalibrated”.
A quick neo-Nazi recap
By now only the brain
dead across NATOstan – and there are hordes – are not aware of Maidan in 2014.
Yet few know that it was then Ukrainian Minister of Interior Arsen Avakov, a
former governor of Kharkov, who gave the green light for a 12,000 paramilitary
outfit to materialize out of Sect 82 soccer hooligans who supported Dynamo
Kiev. That was the birth of the Azov batallion, in May 2014, led by Andriy
Biletsky, a.k.a. the White Fuhrer, and former leader of the neo-nazi gang Patriots
of Ukraine.
Together with NATO
stay-behind agent Dmitro Yarosh, Biletsky founded Pravy Sektor, financed by
Ukrainian mafia godfather and Jewish billionaire Ihor Kolomoysky (later the
benefactor of the meta-conversion of Zelensky from mediocre comedian to
mediocre President.)
Pravy Sektor happened
to be rabidly anti-EU – tell that to Ursula von der Lugen – and politically
obsessed with linking Central Europe and the Baltics in a new, tawdry
Intermarium. Crucially, Pravy Sektor and other nazi gangs were duly trained by
NATO instructors.
Biletsky and Yarosh
are of course disciples of notorious WWII-era Nazi collaborator Stepan Bandera,
for whom pure Ukrainians are proto-Germanic or Scandinavian, and Slavs are
untermenschen.
Azov ended up
absorbing nearly all neo-Nazi groups in Ukraine and were dispatched to fight
against Donbass – with their acolytes making more money than regular soldiers.
Biletsky and another neo-Nazi leader, Oleh Petrenko, were elected to the Rada.
The White Führer stood on his own. Petrenko decided to support then President
Poroshenko. Soon the Azov battalion was incorporated as the Azov Regiment to
the Ukrainian National Guard.
They went on a foreign
mercenary recruiting drive – with people coming from Western Europe,
Scandinavia and even South America.
That was strictly
forbidden by the Minsk Agreements guaranteed by France and Germany (and now de
facto defunct). Azov set up training camps for teenagers and soon reached
10,000 members. Erik “Blackwater” Prince, in 2020, struck a deal with the
Ukrainian military that would enable his renamed outfit, Academi, to supervise
Azov.
It was none other than
sinister Maidan cookie distributor Vicky “F**k the EU” Nuland who suggested to
Zelensky – both of them, by the way, Ukrainian Jews – to appoint avowed Nazi
Yarosh as an adviser to the Commander-in-Chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces,
Gen Valerii Zaluzhnyi. The target: organize a blitzkrieg on Donbass and Crimea
– the same blitzkrieg that SVR, Russian foreign intel, concluded would be
launched on February 22, thus propelling the launch of Operation Z.
All of the above, in
fact just a quick recap, shows that in Ukraine there’s no difference whatsoever
between white neo-Nazis and brown-colored al-Qaeda/ISIS/Daesh, as much as
neo-Nazis are just as “Christian” as takfiri Salafi-jihadis are “Muslim”.
When Putin denounced a
“bunch of neo-Nazis” in power in Kiev, the Comedian replied that it was
impossible because he was Jewish. Nonsense. Zelensky and his patron Kolomoysky,
for all practical purposes, are Zio-Nazis.
Even as branches of
the United States government admitted to neo-Nazis entrenched in the Kiev
apparatus, the Exceptionalist machine made the daily shelling of Donbass for 8
years simply disappear. These thousands of civilian victims never existed.
U.S. mainstream media
even ventured the odd piece or report on Azov and Aidar neo-Nazis. But then a
neo-Orwellian narrative was set in stone: there are no Nazis in Ukraine. CIA
offshoot NED even started deleting records about training members of Aidar.
Recently a crappy news network duly promoted a video of a NATO-trained and
weaponized Azov commander – complete with Nazi iconography.
Why “denazification”
makes sense
The Banderastan
ideology harks back to when this part of Ukraine was in fact controlled by the
Austro-Hungarian empire, the Russian empire and Poland. Stepan Bandera was born
in Austro-Hungary in 1909, near Ivano-Frankovsk, in the – then autonomous –
Kingdom of Galicia.
WWI dismembered
European empires into frequently non-viable small entities. In western Ukraine
– an imperial intersection – that inevitably led to the proliferation of
extremely intolerant ideologies.
Banderastan ideologues
profited from the Nazi arrival in 1941 to try to proclaim an independent
territory. But Berlin not only blocked it but sent them to concentration camps.
In 1944 though the Nazis changed tactics: they liberated the Banderanistas and
manipulated them into anti-Russian hate, thus creating a destabilization force
in the Ukrainian USSR.
So Nazism is not
exactly the same as Banderastan fanatics: they are in fact competing
ideologies. What happened since Maidan is that the CIA kept a laser focus on
inciting Russian hatred by whatever fringe groups it could instrumentalize. So
Ukraine is not a case of “white nationalism” – to put it mildly – but of
anti-Russian Ukrainian nationalism, for all practical purposes manifested via
Nazi-style salutes and Nazi-style symbols.
So when Putin and the
Russian leadership refer to Ukrainian Nazism, that may not be 100% correct,
conceptually, but it strikes a chord with every Russian.
Russians viscerally
reject Nazism – considering that virtually every Russian family has at least
one ancestor killed during the Great Patriotic War. From the perspective of
wartime psychology, it makes total sense to talk of “Ukro-nazism” or, straight
to the point, a “denazification” campaign.
How the Anglos loved
the Nazis
The United States
government openly cheerleading neo-Nazis in Ukraine is hardly a novelty,
considering how it supported Hitler alongside England in 1933 for balance of
power reasons.
In 1933, Roosevelt
lent Hitler one billion gold dollars while England lent him two billion gold
dollars. That should be multiplied 200 times to arrive at today’s fiat dollars.
The Anglo-Americans wanted to build up Germany as a bulwark against Russia. In
1941 Roosevelt wrote to Hitler that if he invaded Russia the U.S. would side
with Russia, and wrote Stalin that if Stalin invaded Germany the U.S. would
back Germany. Talk about a graphic illustration of Mackinderesque balance of
power.
The Brits had become
very concerned with the rise of Russian power under Stalin while observing that
Germany was on its knees with 50% unemployment in 1933, if one counted
unregistered itinerant Germans.
Even Lloyd George had
misgivings about the Versailles Treaty, unbearably weakening Germany after its
surrender in WWI. The purpose of WWI, in Lloyd George’s worldview, was to
destroy Russia and Germany together. Germany was threatening England with the
Kaiser building a fleet to take over the oceans, while the Tsar was too close
to India for comfort. For a while Britannia won – and continued to rule the
waves.
Then building up
Germany to fight Russia became the number one priority – complete with
rewriting of History. The uniting of Austrian Germans and Sudetenland Germans
with Germany, for instance, was totally approved by the Brits.
But then came the
Polish problem. When Germany invaded Poland, France and Britain stood on the
sidelines. That placed Germany on the border of Russia, and Germany and Russia
divided up Poland. That’s exactly what Britain and France wanted. Britain and
France had promised Poland that they would invade Germany from the west while
Poland fought Germany from the east.
In the end, the Poles
were double-crossed. Churchill even praised Russia for invading Poland. Hitler
was advised by MI6 that England and France would not invade Poland – as part of
their plan for a German-Russian war. Hitler had been supported financially
since the 1920s by MI6 for his favorable words about England in Mein Kampf. MI6
de facto encouraged Hitler to invade Russia.
Fast forward to 2022,
and here we go again – as farce, with the Anglo-Americans “encouraging” Germany
under feeble Scholz to put itself back together militarily, with 100 billion
euros (that the Germans don’t have), and setting up in thesis a revamped
European force to later go to war against Russia.
Cue to the Russophobic
hysteria in Anglo-American media about the Russia-China strategic partnership.
The mortal Anglo-American fear is Mackinder/Mahan/Spykman/Kissinger/Brzezinski
all rolled into one: Russia-China as peer competitor twins take over the
Eurasian land mass – the Belt and Road Initiative meets the Greater Eurasia
Partnership – and thus rule the planet, with the U.S. relegated to
inconsequential island status, as much as the previous “Rule Britannia”.
England, France and later
the Americans had prevented it when Germany aspired to do the same, controlling
Eurasia side by side with Japan, from the English Channel to the Pacific. Now
it’s a completely different ball game.
So Ukraine, with its
pathetic neo-Nazi gangs, is just an – expendable – pawn in the desperate drive
to stop something that is beyond anathema, from Washington’s perspective: a
totally peaceful German-Russian-Chinese New Silk Road.
Russophobia, massively
imprinted in the West’s DNA, never really went away. Cultivated by the Brits
since Catherine the Great – and then with The Great Game. By the French since
Napoleon. By the Germans because the Red Army liberated Berlin. By the
Americans because Stalin forced to them the mapping of Europe – and then it
went on and on and on throughout the Cold War.
We are at just the
early stages of the final push by the dying Empire to attempt arresting the
flow of History. They are being outsmarted, they are already outgunned by the
top military power in the world, and they will be checkmated. Existentially,
they are not equipped to kill the Bear – and that hurts. Cosmically.
Ukraine on Fire: 2016
Documentary by Oliver Stone
Analysis by Dr. Joseph
Mercola
March 26, 2022
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Ukraine’s rich land
has historically been used as a pathway for Western powers as they attempted to
conquer the East
As a result, Ukraine,
being surrounded by greater powers on all sides, had to master the art of
changing sides
The Organization of
Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), founded in 1929, had the ultimate goal of
creating an ethnically pure, independent Ukraine
U.S. intelligence agencies
kept watch on Ukrainian nationalist organizations as a source of
counterintelligence against the Soviet Union; declassified CIA documents show
close ties between U.S. intelligence and Ukrainian nationalists since 1946
U.S. meddling during
the Maidan Revolution encouraged demonstrators to overthrow Ukraine’s
democratically elected government
A leaked phone call,
intercepted by Russian intelligence, between Victoria Nuland, the assistant
secretary of state for European and Eurasian Affairs, and U.S. ambassador to
Ukraine Geoffey Pyatt openly discussed their plan for a new Ukraine government
Ukraine is an ancient
and proud land, a borderland where East meets West. Its blue and yellow flag
represents the sky and fields of wheat, and its rich sought-after land has been
used as a pathway — during WWI and WWII — for Western powers as they attempted
to conquer the East.
But, as noted in
"Ukraine on Fire," a 2016 documentary produced by Oliver Stone,
"every time, Ukrainian people ended up paying the highest price for these
grand games of power. "As a result, Ukraine, being surrounded by greater
powers on all sides, had to master the art of changing sides.misse
Beginning in the
middle of the 17th century, Ukrainian leader Bogdan Khmelnitskiy broke a truce
agreement with Poland and sided with more powerful Russia. Five decades later,
during the Russian-Sweden War, Ukrainian leader Ivan Mazepa broke the union
with Russia and joined forces with the Swedish invaders. Ukraine turned into a
German protectorate in 1918, after Russia agreed to the conditions of the
Treaty of Brest-Litovsk.
The fate of Ukraine
was often written by third parties, and, the film notes, "The truth is,
Ukraine has never been a united country. When WWII broke out, a large part of
Western Ukraine's population welcomed the German soldiers as liberators from
the recently-forced-upon-them Soviet rule and openly collaborated with the
Germans."
Organization of
Ukrainian Nationalists Committed Genocide
While the full scale
of collaboration wasn't revealed for many years, whole divisions and battalions
were formed by Ukrainian collaborators, and in the beginning of the war, more
than 80,000 people voluntarily enrolled in the Division "Galicia,"
which was notorious for extreme cruelty toward Jewish, Polish and Russian
people in the territory of Ukraine.
Many members of these
military groups came from the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN),
which was founded in 1929 and had the ultimate goal of creating an ethnically
pure, independent Ukraine. Their official flag was black and red — to represent
land and blood. In 1940, Stepan Bandera, who was anti-Semitic and
anti-communist, became the leader of the most radical section of OUN, and
declared an independent Ukraine in 1941.
The act led his German
allies to put him in prison for most of the war, but he still spread his
ideologies from behind bars. "Many independent historians estimate that
the OUN militia exterminated from 150,000 to 200,000 Jews on Ukrainian
territory occupied by the Germans by the end of 1941."
OUN eventually ended
up fighting equally against German and Soviet forces, but by 1943, USSR forces
pushed back German troops and began liberating Ukraine. Western Ukraine, which
was held by the Germans, was finally liberated in 1944, but Bandera's regime continued
to carry out guerilla warfare on Ukrainian villages until the 1950s.
In 1945, Germany
submitted to the allies, and Ukraine remained a part of the Soviet Union, but
the peace was short-lived. The U.S. and Soviet Union, who were allies to defeat
the Nazis, became foes as the Cold War began, leaving the world under the
constant threat of nuclear war for 45 years.
CIA Protected
Ukrainian Nazi Leaders
U.S. intelligence
agencies kept watch on Ukrainian nationalist organizations as a source of
counterintelligence against the Soviet Union. Declassified CIA documents show
close ties between U.S. intelligence and Ukrainian nationalists since 1946.
After WWII, Bandera
and other Ukrainian Nazi leaders fled to Europe, and the CIA helped protect
them. The CIA later informed the Immigration and Naturalization Service that it
had concealed Bandera and other Ukrainians from the Soviets.
While the Nuremberg
trials brought justice to the leaders of fascist Germany, "the Ukrainian
Nazis were spared the same fate, and some were even granted indulgences by the
CIA. "According to the film, "By 1951, the Agency [CIA] excused the
illegal activities of OUN's security branch in the name of Cold War necessity. "Then,
in a controversial transfer, in 1954, Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev gifted
Crimea to Ukraine.
Ukraine Rocked by
Multiple Revolutions
In 1989, Narodniy
Rukh, or People's Movement, emerged, which advocated for independence of
Ukraine from USSR and became an incubator for leaders of Ukrainian neo-Nazism.
One of them, Oleh Tyahnybok, founded the radical group Svoboda in 1991, which
preached the ideals of Bandera. Additional groups followed.
Also in 1991, the
collapse of the Soviet Union meant that it was the first time in modern history
that Ukraine was truly independent. New businesses emerged as a result of the
newly free economy. Oligarchs emerged seemingly overnight, creating a class
system with a few rich elite and many others struggling to survive.
Multiple revolutions
followed, including the 2004 Orange Revolution, triggered by that year's
presidential election. Support for the two candidates — Viktor Yushchenko and
Viktor Yanukovych — split the country again, east against west. Yushchenko's
wife, Kateryna Yushchenko, is a former U.S. state department official who
worked in the White House during the Reagan administration.
Yushchenko lost, but
many didn't agree with it and charged fraud. Mass protests, with protestors
clad in Yushchenko's orange campaign color, occurred in order to overturn the
results. The election was annulled and Yushchenko won the next election — after
recovering from a mysterious poisoning illness, which is said to have been
carried out by the Ukrainian State Security Service.
US Meddling Encouraged
Coup D'Etat
Yushchenko wasn't elected
to a second term, but he granted Bandera "Hero Status" upon his exit
from office. Yanukovych became the next president, and he removed Bandera's
Hero Status, but in 2013 the government announced it would suspend plans to
sign an association agreement with the European Union, favoring an offer from
Russia instead.
Protests again
resulted, becoming known as the Maidan Revolution. Days of peaceful protests
turned into violence, and U.S. meddling fanned the flames, encouraging
demonstrators to overthrow Ukraine's democratically elected government. As
noted by the CATO Institute:
"A decent respect
for democratic institutions and procedures meant that he [Yanukovych] ought to
be able to serve out his lawful term as president, which would end in 2016 …
Neither the domestic opposition nor Washington and its European Union allies
behaved in that fashion.
Instead, Western
leaders made it clear that they supported the efforts of demonstrators to force
Yanukovych to reverse course and approve the EU agreement or, if he would not
do so, to remove the president before his term expired.
Sen. John McCain (R‑AZ), the
ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, went to Kiev to show
solidarity with the Euromaidan activists. McCain dined with opposition leaders,
including members of the ultraright-wing Svoboda Party, and later appeared on
stage in Maidan Square during a mass rally. He stood shoulder to shoulder with
Svoboda leader Oleg Tyagnibok."
A leaked phone call,
intercepted by Russian intelligence, between Victoria Nuland, the assistant
secretary of state for European and Eurasian Affairs, and U.S. ambassador to
Ukraine Geoffey Pyatt also openly discussed their plan for a new Ukraine
government:
"The U.S‑favored
candidates included Arseniy Yatsenyuk, the man who became prime minister once
Yanukovych was ousted from power. During the telephone call, Nuland stated
enthusiastically that "Yats is the guy" who would do the best job.
Nuland and Pyatt were
engaged in such planning at a time when Yanukovych was still Ukraine's lawful
president. It was startling to have diplomatic representatives of a foreign
country — and a country that routinely touts the need to respect democratic
processes and the sovereignty of other nations — to be scheming about removing
an elected government and replacing it with officials meriting U.S. approval."
US Installed New
Governor in Odessa
Days after Yanukovych
was ousted from office and fled from Kyiv, additional controversy arose over
the Crimea referendum. Officials stated that more than 95% of voters chose to
join Russia, but the U.S. painted it as a Russian invasion. Then, on May 30,
2015, former Georgian president Mikheil Saakashvili — "an old friend of
the U.S." — was appointed to be governor of Ukraine's southern Odessa.
"A quick look at
his biography gives the idea that's he's been groomed for a special
mission," the film states. Saakashvili had received a U.S. State
Department scholarship and worked for a New York law firm. He was involved in
the Rose Revolution in Georgia, which overthrew the legitimately elected
president.
Soon after, Georgia
announced its intentions to join NATO and plant new military bases right on
Russia's border. Saakashvili was later accused of misuse of power, embezzlement
and other criminal charges, but he fled to the U.S., where his friends in
Washington found him another assignment as governor of Odessa.
Shortly before, he
gave up his citizenship to Georgia to become a Ukrainian citizen. Adding to the
anti-Russian rhetoric was the 2014 Malaysian Airlines jet crash, which was shot
down by a missile over Ukraine, killing 298 people.
The U.S. and Ukraine
blamed Russia, leading to immediate sanctions against the country. But a
Russian report found a different conclusion — that the plane was shot down by a
Ukraine missile. According to the film:
"One would expect
that these controversial results would again stir up public interest in the
investigation, but the tragedy of Malaysian flight MH17 had already played its
role in the big geopolitical game.
Therefore, it was soon
forgotten. The goal was achieved. After the third wave of sanctions hit Russia,
the tensions between the two countries skyrocketed, so the question presents
itself, are we truly witnessing the beginning of Cold War 2.0, and if so, what
are our chances to survive it this time?"
2022: Doomsday Clock
at 100 Seconds to Midnight
The Bulletin of Atomic
Scientists introduced the Doomsday Clock in 1947. It represents a countdown to
global nuclear annihilation. During the height of the Cold War, it came its
closest to midnight — 2 minutes — then cooled, stretching to 17 minutes by
1991.
In 2015, around the
time the film was released, increased instability had moved the clock back to 3
minutes to midnight, due to modernizations in global nuclear weapons and
"outsized nuclear weapons arsenals," with world leaders failing to
"act with the speed or on the scale required to protect citizens from
potential catastrophe." At the time, the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists
read:
"The clock ticks
now at just three minutes to midnight because international leaders are failing
to perform their most important duty — ensuring and preserving the health and
vitality of human civilization."
In an update released
January 20, 2022, however, the Bulletin reported that the world is "at
doom's doorstep," with the clock moving to just 100 seconds to midnight:
"The Clock
remains the closest it has ever been to civilization-ending apocalypse because
the world remains stuck in an extremely dangerous moment. In 2019 we called it
the new abnormal, and it has unfortunately persisted … Leaders around the world
must immediately commit themselves to renewed cooperation in the many ways and
venues available for reducing existential risk.
Citizens of the world
can and should organize to demand that their leaders do so — and quickly. The
doorstep of doom is no place to loiter … Without swift and focused action,
truly catastrophic events — events that could end civilization as we know it —
are more likely. When the Clock stands at 100 seconds to midnight, we are all
threatened. The moment is both perilous and unsustainable, and the time to act
is now."
The Ukraine War Gets
Worse
BY PORTFOLIO ARMOR
MONDAY, MAR 28, 2022
Over the last few
years, many Americans have pivoted sharply from one current crusade to another,
from Black Lives Matter, to COVID masking, to supporting Ukraine, as the meme
below illustrates.
Meme showing NPCs
going from one moral crusade to another.
In the first two
cases, the subject turned out to be more complex than the media initially
reported. In the case of the war in Ukraine, one could argue it was morally
complex to begin with.
As Llewellyn Rockwell
notes here, the Ukrainian military had been attacking Russian-speaking
separatists in the Donbass region since 2014. And as mainstream media outlets
reported several years ago, the Ukrainian military included some Nazis.
Despite that, the
current war in Ukraine has been largely portrayed by U.S. media so far as
morally clear cut: Russia invaded Ukraine unprovoked, and we must support the
plucky Ukrainian defenders, who are fighting for democracy. Now it turns out
this current crusade is more complicated too.
Torturing Russian POWs
Over the weekend,
videos emerged of Ukrainian troops recording themselves torturing Russian POWs,
including shooting them in the kneecaps before beating them. I'm not going to
post the gruesome videos here, but if you have the stomach for it, you can
click on the tweet below to see them.
Is This Russian
Propaganda ?
Anything is possible,
but the videos appear to be from Ukrainian Telegram channels. And the behavior
is consistent with previous reports that a Ukrainian hospital director ordered
his staff to castrate wounded Russian POWs.
Aren't The Russians
Committing War Crimes Too?
That's entirely
possible too, though a U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency analyst quoted by
Newsweek recently said that
Putin is not
intentionally attacking civilians, that perhaps he is mindful that he needs to
limit damage in order to leave an out for negotiations.
If the Russians are
committing war crimes though, that's on them. But if Ukrainian troops funded
and armed by the United States are committing war crimes, we as Americans may
bear some responsibility for that, and may face blowback for it.
Adding To Geopolitical
Risks
As we pointed out in
our previous post, geopolitical risk has been rising recently, abetted by a
lack of diplomatic communication between the United States and Russia, and
President Biden's call for regime change in Moscow. If Ukrainians have been
torturing Russian POWs, Russia may retaliate in horrific fashion, increasing
the odds of NATO intervention.
Bioweapons Expert
Speaks Out About US Biolabs in Ukraine
Analysis by Dr. Joseph
Mercola
April 09, 2022
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
According to
bioweapons expert Francis Boyle, Russia’s accusation that Ukraine is conducting
U.S.-funded bioweapons research appears to be accurate
If true, everyone
involved is subject to life in prison under the Biological Weapons
Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989
According to Boyle,
the U.S. government and Pentagon have had a “comprehensive policy” to “surround
Russia with biological warfare laboratories” and “preposition biological
weapons” there for use against them
The problem with
trying to make a distinction between “biodefense” and “biowarfare” is that,
basically, there is none. No biodefense research is purely defensive, because
to do biodefense work, you’re automatically engaged in the creation of
biological weapons, and all dual use research can be used for military
purposes. SARS-CoV-2 may be the result of such dual use research
Boyle believes we can
hold the culprits behind the SARS-CoV-2 bioweapon accountable by asking local
prosecutors to convene a grand jury to seek the indictment of those responsible
for the pandemic for murder and conspiracy to commit murder
(...)
What Drives the
Biowarfare Industry ?
When asked what the
motive behind this kind of research might be, Boyle highlights two potential
reasons. First, he says, there’s a global “Nazi cult” that simply does not want
to stop. They want to be able to rid the world of certain ethnic groups, hence the
focus on DNA-based ethnic-specific weapons.
He points out that the
United States is the only country in the world that has not abided by the law
to get rid of all its biological weapons. Instead, we’ve been making more,
under the guise of biodefense research.
President Reagan put
Dr. Anthony Fauci in charge of the U.S. biological weapons program, and he’s
been at it ever since. “About 95% of this biowarfare death science has been
funded by Fauci, the NIAID and the NIH, since about 1984,” Boyle says.
In previous
interviews, Boyle has stated he believes SARS-CoV-2 is an engineered bioweapon,
and here, he again reviews some of the reasons why. He points out that Shi
Zheng-li, the famous bat coronavirus researcher at the Wuhan Institute of
Virology in China, was trained at the biolab in Galveston, Texas, which is
“part of U.S. biological warfare industry.”
“[Shi Zheng-li] took a
synthetic biology organism from the Wuhan BSL4, brought it over to the
University of North Carolina, BSL3, and then gave it gain-of-function
properties under Ralph Baric, who's an expert on this, and his team.
And, by the way, the
FDA was involved in this too. Now think about that. The FDA that is approving
these Frankenshots that are killing and disabling people was involved in the
development of COVID-19. So, they've got us on both sides here.
Likewise, [CDC
director Rochelle] Walensky, who can't get her story straight either, she comes
from Harvard Medical School. Harvard Medical School was involved in the
development of the COVID-19 biological warfare weapon. Indeed, Harvard was one
of the sponsoring institutions of the Wuhan BSL4.
The chair of the
Harvard chemistry department, [Dr. Charles] Lieber, he was over there too, with
his own lab specializing in nanotechnology. And Lieber had also worked for the
Pentagon.”
The second motivating
factor is money. Not only do they make money on the research and creation of
these biological weapons, but they also make money on the supposed cures, be
they vaccines or therapeutics.
The U.S. is not alone
in creating dangerous biological weapons, of course. “The British are also a
part of this, the French, the Israelis.
We have a network and
a cult of Nazi biowarfare death scientists,” Boyle says.
