Despite mass censorship,
RFK Jr.’s book on Fauci’s corruption is #1 best seller on Amazon
The Covid crisis has confirmed to the naked eye that there is a tyrannical collusion between the private powers and the public authorities but it has also revealed that the USA, THE capitalistic nation and China, its communist antithesis are in bed although they still mimic a deep opposition.
Why is a US
DNA-processing firm sharing Americans’ DNA with China ?
This article pinpoints many hidden historical points about that, and much more:
Beyond Ivermectin: our
freedom stolen
Beyond the fight against the states' tyranny, Ivermectin, is the battle to be fought tooth and nail following the outstanding example of a timely brought up team consisting of a Covid patient, a family member, an advocate and a judge as in the following stories:
A Judge stands up to a hospital: "Step aside" and give a dying man Ivermectin
(Another) judge holds hospital in contempt: Give Ivermectin to dying woman or pay $10,000-a-day fine
related:
1
Daniel Nagase
I am here today
because I dared to treat 3 Covid patients with Ivermectin, a safe and effective
drug.
The good news is that
all 3 elderly patients who received Ivermectin recovered from Covid and were
discharged from hospital.
The bad news is that
after curing those 3 patients, I was banned from working in all of Alberta's
hospitals.
What I thought was
just a hospital problem turned out to be far bigger, as I was about to
discover.
There is a regulatory
problem, where both the colleges in BC and Alberta, the colleges that dictate
who may practice medicine, banned the use of Ivermectin to treat Covid.
But not only did they ban a safe drug. (...)
2
Dr Pierre Kory
(Mercola.com,12/12/21)
The FLCC Protocol
Sadly, the willful ignorance of many doctors is literally killing many COVID patients who could have, and should have, been saved. There’s just no doubt that protocols such as the one developed by the FLCC and the other groups listed below could have saved many, had it been widely implemented. Yet despite its success, many hospitals to this day do not use it.
“Our protocol is
always evolving,” he notes. “We're not saying that this is the only way to
treat it. This is how we decided to treat it. We reserve the right to
deprioritize or change the dose, or substitute a new medicine.
We want to follow the data, the experience and the knowledge of this disease. That's No. 1. No. 2, all of our protocols are combination therapy protocols.
And by the way, that
gives doctors fits. You know why? Because they want to know, how do you know
that this is necessary? There are trials of each individual component showing
that they're effective. We believe they're synergistic, but we're never going
to do a trial to test every component on our protocols.
But there are a number
of other protocols. The AAPS has a protocol.1 The World Council for Health,2
they have a number of options. So there are many doctors who might emphasize or
de-emphasize a medicine on our protocol. And we do not pretend that ours is the
only way. But we do put a lot of thought into it.
Most of our medicines
are repurposed, so they're not novel. They're very well-known over decades,
their safety profiles are well known, they tend to be generally low cost, and
their mechanisms are well-known. A central medicine to all of our protocols —
prevention, early treatment, hospital, and late phase like long-haul [syndrome]
is ivermectin, for many reasons.”
Why Ivermectin?
As noted by Kory, ivermectin is a potent antiviral. “That's been demonstrated for 10 years now in the lab on a number of viruses,” he says. “They've shown that it interrupts replication of Zika, Dengue, West Nile, even HIV. And then the clinical studies are just overwhelming.” He continues:
“Can I just take one
minute to say that if anyone wants to call ivermectin a controversial medicine,
I just want to call out it is absolutely not controversial.
It is a medicine that is buried in corruption, and the corruption is in the suppressing of its efficacy. There are immense powers that do not want the efficacy of that drug to be known because, if it is known and becomes standard of care, it will obliterate the market for a number of novel pharmaceutical products.
When you look at the
actions taken against ivermectin, it can only be understood that it's
threatening something big and powerful, because boy has it been attacked [even
though it’s been used in] 64 controlled trials, almost every single one of them
showing benefit, many of them large benefits.
Yet they distort it to
make it seem like it's controversial. It's absurd. We know it works. We know it
from in vitro, in vivo animal studies, and case series.”
One of the first case series, from the Dominican Republic, was published in June 2020. They treated 3,300 consecutive emergency room COVID patients with ivermectin. Of those, only 16 went on to be hospitalized and one died. That’s pretty profound, considering these were severely ill individuals.
Importantly though,
there is a dose-response relationship to the viral load. The Delta variant has
been shown to produce viral loads that are 250 times higher than Alpha, and as
Delta became predominant, breakthrough cases in the prevention protocol started
happening.
“I'm one of them. I
got COVID while I was taking it weekly,” Kory says. “Now we're doing it twice
weekly. Is it the right dose? We're not sure. But we're seeing much fewer
breakthroughs now on a higher dose. Could it be higher? Maybe. But, but we know
it works as prevention.”
Higher doses of
ivermectin are also used for treatment of Delta. In more advanced stages, the
drug is useful thanks to its anti-inflammatory properties. Contrary to many
other drugs, ivermectin is beneficial in all stages of the infection.
Vitamin D Optimization
Is Crucial
Other components of the FLCC’s prevention and treatment protocols include products that have either antiviral or anti-inflammatory properties, or a combination thereof, such as melatonin, quercetin and zinc, and anticoagulants such as aspirin.
If you haven’t done so
already, check your vitamin D blood level and if it’s below 40 ng/mL, start
taking an oral supplement. Don’t wait until you’re sick.
Ideally, everyone
would optimize their vitamin D level before ever needing treatment for COVID.
If you haven’t done so already, check your vitamin D blood level and if it’s
below 40 ng/mL, start taking an oral supplement. Don’t wait until you’re sick.
The medical literature suggests population-wide vitamin D optimization, to a
level above 40 ng/mL, could have reduced COVID morbidity and mortality by about
80%.
“No question,” Kory says. “In fact ... there was a study that came out, a huge database of patients, where they looked at patients who tested their vitamin D levels before they got ill. They estimated — and they did no fancy statistical modeling logistic regression — that at 50 ng/mL, there was zero mortality.
The federal government
knows that vitamin D deficiency ... is ubiquitous in nursing homes [and
minorities] ... So, that we didn't have a vitamin D protocol nationally is
criminal. Literally, it's criminal.”
In the hospital
treatment protocol, the FLCCC recommends using calcitriol, 0.5 micrograms on
Day 1 and 0.25 mcg daily thereafter for six days. Calcitriol is the active form
of vitamin D typically produced in your kidneys.
This is because merely
taking regular oral vitamin D fails in acute conditions as it takes weeks to be
metabolized to its active form. Calcitriol is the active form, so it will start
to work immediately. One can also take the vitamin D, though, as eventually
adequate blood levels will be reached and the calcitriol can be discontinued.
Chloroquine is a
potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread
Now this is a plain to
see smoking gun of a conspiracy.
The law says that if a
treatment already exists, then the vaccines cannot be given emergency use
authorization and thus cannot be rushed to market. That is why they
intentionally demonized and ridiculed HCQ and Ivermectin and any other possible
treatments.
Even today, HCQ is still
not promoted as a treatment when we know for a fact that it actually works, and
the scientific community has known this for a very long time as well.
These mRNA vaccines
should NEVER HAVE RECEIVED EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION.
NB: Professor Didier Raoult, multi-awarded microbiologist from Marseille, France, supported HCQ from the start and was vilified non stop because of that ...
No comments:
Post a Comment