STORY
AT-A-GLANCE
- In his book, “Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon? A
Scientific and Forensic Investigation,” Dr. Richard Fleming documents
evidence showing SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon created over the past two
decades
- Once you conclude that SARS-CoV-2 is a
bioweapon, you must also recognize that the COVID shots are nothing more
than the genetic reproduction of that bioweapon. In other words, they are
bioweapons too
- The same people involved in the funding of
this bioweapon are the same people who have interfered with doctors
providing treatment to patients, and the same people who have been
involved in the development of these COVID shots
- Health care workers are injecting people
with something they cannot possibly give informed consent for, which means
health care workers are violating their Hippocratic Oath
- Health care workers who give these COVID
shots are also violating the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights Treaty, the Nuremberg Code, the Declaration of Helsinki and other
legal statutes
Helping you
take control of your health in these crazy times is Dr. Richard Fleming, a
prolific author in addition to being a physicist, a nuclear cardiologist,
researcher and attorney.
Here, we
discuss his latest book “Is
COVID-19 a Bioweapon? A Scientific and Forensic Investigation,” slated
for release September 7, 2021. It’s currently available for preorder on Amazon.
It’s an incredibly well-documented book and contains history that many of us
aren't aware of. As it turns out, the creation of this virus goes back not a
year or two but two decades.
“My
area of aptitude [is] physics and calculus, the mathematic language for that.
Physics, and particularly high energy particle physics, is something that I
find very fascinating.
I
eventually wound up doing some of that later on in life as a nuclear
cardiologist. So, [I’ve done] 53 years of research in physics, and in medicine,
I actually developed the inflammation in heart disease theory and presented it
to American Heart in 1994.
I
joined American Heart in 1976 as the youngest faculty member at that time, and
I got put in several standing committees as a result — basic and advanced
cardiac life support as well as the physician cholesterol education faculty.
I did
a lot of research on dietary influences and factors that are critical, not only
for in the end — heart disease — but other chronic inflammatory diseases, be
that cerebrovascular diseases, strokes, diabetes or cancer,” Fleming
explains.
Standing
on Principles of Ethics
Fleming is
also a scientific reviewer for more than 16 different journals. He was on the
external clinical review board for The Lancet, but quit in protest of the fake
hydroxychloroquine article they published — an act I believe demonstrates his
dedication to scientific integrity. He also resigned from the British Medical
Journal Open Quality due to similar concerns.
“Eventually
we either stand behind principles or we acquiesce and become nothing more than
the German doctors of Nazi Germany during World War II,” he
says. “And as history showed us, they eventually paid a price at the
Nuremberg Trials …
There
are people — powers that be — that think that they have things going their
direction, but it's very clear to me that they're not confident that they've got
everybody under control. The way in which this is all being handled
demonstrates that they're more worried about the truth coming out than not. And
I think they're worried about the consequences, as they should be.”
Digging
Up the Truth
Early on in
2020, Fleming started researching treatment options for SARS-CoV-2 using the
Fleming Method, which you can learn more about on flemingmethod.com. Using this
method, you can measure how a given intervention works on the tissue level, and
how infection or inflammation is responding to the treatment.
He ended up
developing 52 treatment combinations, and over the course of that study, the
length of hospitalization stays went from five to six weeks down to one to two
weeks. But he also learned something else.
“In
the process of doing that research, I dug more and more and investigated what
was going on, and that led me into the background of the research that many of
these people had been doing,” Fleming explains.
“Tens
of millions of dollars have been funneled out of the U.S., and Anthony Fauci
has helped with that. He's been on those committees. You can see the grant
numbers in the book.”
Is
COVID-19 a Bioweapon?
While
gain-of-function can be used for benevolent purposes, it can just as easily be
used for nefarious ones, “and that's kind of what you see happening,” Fleming
says.
“You
see real efforts to produce viruses, coronaviruses, in particular. Spike
proteins of coronaviruses to be even more specific, as I show in the book, paid
for by the federal government by people who say they were not involved in
gain-of-function research.
Well,
their fingerprints are on the documents, or on the published papers or on the
grants or on the patents. You can't say that you're not involved in things when
the documents show differently. They show the work and the money that came out
of the federal government that went to Peter Daszak at EcoHealth, that went to
Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina, Shi Zhengli at the Wuhan Institute
of Virology and other places.
For
me, as a researcher, obviously, once I start to investigate something, the only
way you can stop me from doing that is to put a bullet in my head. Otherwise,
I'm going to stay after it. There are things that are not in the book that are
going to come out in international criminal court, things I'm saving for that,
because this virus is, by definition, a biological weapon.
It
violates the biological weapons convention treaty. You just have to look at the
definitions. It provides nothing useful to humanity. It's dangerous. When Fort
Detrick is involved and the Department of Defense is involved … and you see
these monies and you see the people that are involved, you realize that … the
United States was playing China, China was playing the United States, and you
saw who got caught in between. And they're still playing the game.
For
lack of a better term, this book is an indictment. That's now my attorney hat
going on saying that I have provided in this book evidence that I would take to
a grand jury … I'm not somebody who is going to give up on having these people
dealt with, because all the freedoms that we have lost, and the rights that we
have lost as individuals, not to mention just the numbers of people who have
died.
My
argument is … the reason why they died is because they didn't get treatment for
the inflammation and the blood clotting that I and other doctors have shown works.
The ultimate argument is that you can't kill somebody more than dead … they
can't do worse than kill the patient. And we've already seen what doing nothing
does. It kills the patient.
At no
other time in American history have doctors looked at patients and said, ‘We
can't do anything for you. Go home and come back when you get sicker.’ We have
always treated people with breathing problems with medications for breathing
problems. We've always treated people with clotting problems with medicines to
stop the clotting.
And
so, the reason why this is so critical to understand is because the same people
who were involved in the funding of this bioweapon are the same people who have
interfered with doctors providing treatment to patients, and the same people who
have been involved in the development of these vaccines.”
While Fleming
carefully lays out the evidence in his book, he leaves it up to you, the
reader, to decide whether SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon or not. However, he says,
if you do come to that conclusion (and he believes you will once you’ve seen
the evidence), “then you have to recognize that the vaccines are nothing more
than the genetic reproduction of that bioweapon.” Hence, the COVID shots are
bioweapons too.
Warning
to Medical Professionals
If you are a
doctor, nurse, pharmacist or other health professional administering these
COVID shots, you may be wise to reconsider your participation in this scheme. A
significant problem is there’s no way to provide or obtain informed consent. As
noted by Fleming:
“If
you're injecting someone with these drug vaccine biologics, you are injecting
them with something that you cannot possibly give them informed consent for,
which means you're violating your Hippocratic Oath, you're violating the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Treaty, you're violating
the Nuremberg Code, you're violating the Declaration of Helsinki.
It's
right across the board. It's not even something that you can pretend doesn't
happen anymore. It's just in everybody's faces. And you can see that the powers
that be are so stressed out right now that they are cajoling and coercing and
manipulating and attacking. My friends in Italy tell me that vaccinated people
are behaving in the same way that they did during World War II towards the Jews
and the intellectuals.
And
let's remember, the first people Hitler put in concentration camps weren't the
Jews. The first people were the intellectuals, because if you take the
intellectuals and the doctors off the street, if you stop people from talking,
you can control the people.
So,
the pressure being put on the medical community in this country and in
countries around the world to simply go along is nothing more than the
equivalent of what Adolf Hitler and the SS did during World War II when they
rounded up the intellectuals. One [thing] will lead to the next and there's
nothing about this that has been a successful campaign to control an infectious
virus …
All
you have to do is read the emergency use authorization documents. I'm just
stunned at how many people have not read these. I'm stunned at physicians not
having read these.”
On
flemingmethod.com, you can find several video presentations and
PDFs where Fleming goes through the emergency use authorization
documents. With that data in hand, Fleming suggests asking yourself some
fundamental scientific questions, such as: “Is there any statistical difference
in the number of people who developed COVID-19 or died among the vaccinated
compared to the unvaccinated?”
The answer
provided in the documents is no. There is no statistical difference between the
two groups. The vaccines do not statistically reduce COVID-19 infection or
death thereof. There are fewer cases in absolute numbers, but statistically
there’s no difference. Add to that the risk of side effects. If you take the
shot, you risk developing inflammation and blood clotting.
The same
people that were involved in the funding of this bioweapon are the same people
that have interfered with doctors providing treatment to patients, and the same
people that have been involved in the development of these vaccines. ~ Dr.
Richard Fleming
As noted
above, coerced administration of these shots violate any number of laws.
Fleming also cites supreme court rulings in which the court ruled people have
the right to choose their own health care.
“Rochin
versus California had to do with an individual who was forced to undergo emetic
medications to force him to vomit, to bring up things in his stomach. The
Supreme Court said, ‘You do not have a right to force this medication on
people.’
Griswold
versus Connecticut showed that the U.S. government cannot take away the
personal rights of health care in individuals unless there's some type of
compelling and substantial reason, and then it has to be put into law. It can't
come out of the executive branch.
Cruzan
versus Director of Missouri Department of Health in 1990, specifically stated
that patients have a right to refuse any treatment. You cannot force treatment
on people. Well, this is forced treatment. This is coerced treatment.
And
Doe v. Rumsfeld proved in 2004 that investigational drugs could not be forced
upon people unless there is a presidential waiver or informed consent. Well,
here's the kicker on presidential waiver, which is what they're going to go to.
Anybody
who takes an oath of office — the president of the United States, senators,
representatives to Congress, governors, police officers, judges, lawyers,
administrative officials — cannot violate the U.S. Constitution. If they do,
they've committed treason, by definition.
In
the U.S. Constitution, it states that Treaty Law and the Constitution and
statutes are the supreme law of the land. The International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights specifically states that you cannot force people to take a
drug; that they have to have informed consent, and that animal research has to
have been done beforehand to prove it's safe.
So,
if a president, including this one, issues an order that this is a mandate and
is required, then he is violating the U.S. Constitution by violating Treaty and
therefore has committed treason.
It's
not only an impeachable offense, it is punishable by death because that's [the
punishment for] treason. You can't force U.S. citizens to undergo forced
experimentation.
And
you can't get around that by doing something cute like having the FDA say,
‘Whoa, well, we've now approved it, OK?’ Because the Supreme Court has already
ruled that you cannot force people to take a treatment and the only party that
can change that is the Supreme Court.”
Moderna
Has Been Aware of Risks for Years
You’ve
probably heard that the mRNA in the COVID shots are designed to stay right
around the injection site. However, Fleming points out that Moderna knew this
wasn’t the case, as they published research in 2017 showing a lipid
nanoparticle vaccine for influenza ended up in the brain, bone marrow, liver,
spleen and just about everywhere else in the bodies of the test animals.
“So,
for people to come up now and say, ‘Gosh, golly gee whiz, we just didn't expect
that’ is a little disingenuous,” Fleming says. “And I
think you have to ask yourself, why does the cardiologist know about the 2017
paper but the people responsible for the technology claim they don't?
And
so, what you see are normal healthy people responding to a massive production
of spike proteins and healthy people should make a massive immune response.
What does that immune response do? It produces inflammation and blood clotting,
and then the spike proteins go across the blood-brain barrier and cause prion
diseases just like what's been shown in humanized mice and rhesus macaque
models.
I'm
willing to bet that the people who made this gain-of-function virus already
knew that, because one of the things that had the government and Big Pharma
coming after me in the 1990s [and] early 2000s was the fact that the research I
was doing in dietary and inflammatory disease had the same Neu-5-Ac raft
receptor that the glycoprotein 120 of HIV — which Shi Zhengli put [into the
virus] in 2004 — attaches to.
So,
the people that were doing this were paralleling my research … It turns out
that that information is critical for getting this virus to be able to attach
and to infect people like it's doing. So, it's interesting how you can be
minding your own business and doing really good research, trying to answer some
questions, and it might just expose the people that are doing nefarious
things.”
What
You Can Do if Your Job Mandates the Jab
Flemingmethod.com
is a real treasure trove of information that you can surf through. There,
you’ll also find sample documents for medical, religious, legal
and Constitutional exemptions to vaccination that you can present
to your employer, educational institution or anyone else trying to bully you
into taking an experimental COVID shot.
He also
has fliers you can print
out and distribute that lay out your U.S. Constitutional and
statutory rights as a citizen, as well as petitions for the President of the
United States, Senate, House of Representatives and state governors, calling on
them to investigate those responsible for this gain-of-function bioweapon. You
can find all of those petitions under the “Actions” tab at the top right
corner. Fleming also encourages people to take legal action.
“I'm
working with a number of attorneys to file suits in [the U.S.], [and I’m] one
of the experts in the International Court and Italian courts for suits being
filed for crimes against humanity. So, the bottom line answer to this is going
to be everybody deciding that they need to take action and [hold those
responsible] accountable. And yes, this may mean you lose your job …
You
have to look at this, at this point in time, and ask yourself what type of
world are you leaving your children and your grandchildren? This is never about
you. This is never about me. This is about the children and the grandchildren.
Whatever
we leave them, they're going to essentially be stuck with it. If we abandon
them — and the founding fathers did not abandon us — then we are responsible
for allowing this to happen. It's on us, so there's no easy way … If you ever
wondered what you would have done in 1930s Germany, today, you know.”
Cases
Filed With International Criminal Court
According to
Fleming, Italian lawyers have already filed a case in Italian Federal Courts
and plan to file with the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague.
Attorneys from six different countries are also putting together a joint case.
While the U.S. did not ratify the ICC, American citizens can still be held
accountable in the ICC.
Laws and
statutes being relied upon include the Biological Weapons Convention treaty,
the Nuremberg Code, the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Covenant
on Civil and Political Rights. It’s now up to the ICC to decide what it wants
to do, and when.
“It
doesn't really matter how long this takes or to whom this has to go. I'm a firm
believer that there are enough good, honest people on this planet that if the
people communicate and work together, the tide on this can and will be turned,” Fleming
says.
“It’s
the same story all over the world. All the people that I’ve talked to in the
different countries that I've been working with have the same feeling. They're
coerced. Their citizens are being bribed, which, as a side note, anytime the
government has to bribe the people to do it, you have to say, ‘If it was really
a good idea, why would you have to bribe me? I would be lining up for it.’
I'm
the ultimate, I think, research scientist. After 53 years, I really feel very
strongly about being a scientist physician. And I am incredibly offended when
Anthony Fauci says he is science, because he's not …
If
these ‘vaccines’ actually worked and there was scientific evidence, I'd be on
here telling you to take it. What you're hearing me tell you is, ‘Don't take
it.’ These things are biological weapons. They're nothing more than a genetic
code of a biological weapon that was made, that was paid for, and put together
by nefarious people … I'm not anti-vaccine. I'm anti-stupid.”
We’re
Battling the Biggest Propaganda Campaign in History
In closing,
Fleming says:
“One
of the things I do want to make a comment on now is for the people who have not
been vaccinated. When you're looking at people who have been vaccinated, step
back for just a moment and recognize that many of those people got vaccinated
because they were told that this was the only way to protect the people that
they loved.
What
we need to do is have the intelligence and the compassion necessary to look at those
individuals and say, ‘I get it. No judgment.’ If there's a shedding problem or
something like that that you're dealing with, there are treatments available
that you can look at. I put those on the website, too.
But
come together and support those people, because they were just doing what they
thought was right. Many of them are scared, and they have been made so scared.
By the way, what type of country, what type of world, spends so much effort
frightening the blazes out of its citizens? That says something.”
Indeed, this
is undoubtedly the most effective propaganda campaign in the history of
humanity, and it’s hard to blame someone for cracking under that type of a
coordinated assault. The good news is that common sense has not entirely died
yet. Fleming says:
“I
think there's a lot of people that are very concerned that things have gone
south, so to speak. I'm actually encouraged. One of the things that I've
noticed about being here in Texas is that common sense has not died … [and]
what I've repeatedly gotten from people is ‘Don't dumb it down.’
It's
not a matter of turning people into Ph.D., M.D.’s or whatever, it's a matter of
just being truthful and honest with them. People have a really good capacity,
when they get away from all the nonsense happening, to look at the truth and
realize it's the truth and to listen to nonsense being thrown at them and
realize that it's just garbage and manipulation. So, common sense is a really
useful tool for everybody to have. That and compassion …
We
used to frequently sit down and have conversations with families and friends
where you'd argue back and forth and you discuss things, and I can't be the
only person that would walk away from a conversation and go, ‘Well, I hadn't
really thought about that. Let me think about that’ because that's kind of a
different point of view.
That
exchange stopped when they quarantined people, when they isolated us, put us in
our homes and controlled what you could see on the Internet and on television.
Well, we've come far enough back out of it that that exchange has started
again.
People
have had to fight to get that information out, but it's that sharing of
information and knowledge that is so critical to turning this around, and
actually bringing all of this nonsense under control. Not just the virus, but
the manipulation of people that has been going on and the lies and the deceit
and the abuse of power. They used our money to do it. They used our lives to do
it. They used our livelihoods to do it.”
More
Information
To learn
more, be sure to pick up a copy of “Is
COVID-19 a Bioweapon? A Scientific and Forensic Investigation.” You can
also find a lot of information on flemingmethod.com, including
science-based treatment
suggestions for COVID-19 and side effects from either the COVID
shot or spike protein transmission from a person who got the shot.
The perilous censoring
of Dr Peter McCullough
Bats, Gene
Editing and Bioweapons: Recent DARPA Experiments Raise Concerns Amid
Coronavirus Outbreak
Rationale forvitamin C treatment of COVID-19 and other viruses
No comments:
Post a Comment