AFRAID OF ROBOTS ? DON’T LOOK IN THE MIRROR !
If something wrong is happening, if this something concerns the whole
population and if it is known enough to be heard of at a rate of, say one time
a year, or ten years, then, this something ought to trigger a reaction from
you. If you do not deny it, whether it has to be denied by your principles, by
who you are or by what you value and respect, I say, if you are not against it,
you are for it. There is no middle way. But, if you however ride on this middle
fantasy way, you lower yourself to a level of infamy.
All you have to do is becoming informed and the most basically daily
news will tell you the truth if you can see it. If you go along with it and
bury it under the rag by your own decision, you become a priest who goes with a
whore, a soldier who fights with the enemy, an aggressor unto your own self.
Then, you have to disguise yourself, to follow the fashion, to enter the circle
of the damned. You get LOST. Ant it is quite easy, and quick, sometimes as fast
as a spark.
The condition not to fall into this peril or to get out of it is to get
real, with yourself. When you know for sure something is bad you are the one needed
to fight it, for yourself in the first place; you should spend some of your
life to do just that. Whether it is a general item, a local or a familial
problem, you yourself are expected to not throw it in the shadow. If you nonetheless
do that, you become a robot. You are no more the loving creature that you are
expected to be, toward you yourself first, not even mentioning the others or
God.
There are things that are aggravating that matter like poverty or luxury
... Both are transforming people into robots, the first to 'outlive' and the
second to survive. The third class of robots is the one who don't care about
anything as long as their basic needs are provided for.
Humanity has two inside enemies: the ones who want to dominate, to lead,
to govern others by all means and the ones who are satisfied with the bread and
games allowed by the first, and they are the majority by large. Humanity is
still in the moral shape it was millenaries ago mostly because of that majority
that is satisfied by a glass of wine and doesn’t care to unite against the
small pocket of self- appointed ‘leaders’.
The precondition to get united is to understand and accept that we are
not what we should be, as much individually as collectively. There are crimes
against humanity that must be taken into account which we should fight against
with no rest until their disappearance. We should and we could become better
men, and women, if only we would care … together.
First of all, war has no place in humanity, political, economic or
religious. Nation against nation, group against group, people against people.
No one should give a hand to wars, near or far. Then, we should not pile up
inside big cities but keep in touch with nature in our day today life, set up
as much rural communities as needed and bring working places to the
countryside. We should see the other as a fellow and friend, not as a
competitor or a stranger.
We should follow the natural law, the natural order that is based on
love and trust. Parents love their children and children love their parents.
The strong must help the weak and should thank him for giving his strength a
goal that has a noble meaning and not just self-interest. And so on, this is
what life is about, elevating oneself with the other’s help. As I said at the
beginning, there is no middle way. Either you follow these principle and it is
a win-win, either you don’t and we all lose.
"Of Course With G.od"
FROM HERE
Mike B said (July 14, 2014):
The real problem and enigma is of course the mindset of the collective public, which can effectively be manipulated to side against logic, and rationalize immoral or exceptionalist positions. The real question is about the ability of discernment and the intellectual integrity of the public, particularly in the USA.
Demanding answers from the corrupted system is a dead end street, just like trying to present clear explanations to citizens who don't want clear explanations. I relate it to national elections, where your participation indicates your acceptance of a charade.
The collective obstinacy in the face of truth can be explained somewhat as genetic, as herd instinct, and the need for authorities,as the news media is assumed to be. Conditioning plays a part. Vague fears play a part, and having an identifiable enemy to bomb means that security is being defended.
- Another angle for understanding the public might be better explained by the resident voodoo specialist. All of the bad guys are connected to the occult in some manner. A spell involves focused thought, released as emotional energy at the conclusion of a ritual. The idea is to influence the perception of reality.
-The public is dis-empowered on a daily basis through the controlled culture, the lying mainstream media, and the diet of compromised foods. I'm saying that no one has to be convinced that 911 was an inside job. If they don't know by now you can be sure it is because they are not interested in knowing. The grassroots truth about 911 or the war would have spread like wildfire, even without the help of the controlled communications media, if the public was actually interested.
